22 - Pose

The performance gap illustrates progress in handling self-occlusion and non-frontal views. Notably, Pose 22 is often included in ablation studies as a "hard example" due to its [2]. 5. Cross-Dataset Comparison: The Ambiguity of "Pose 22" Outside MPII, "Pose 22" appears in other datasets with entirely different meanings:

| Joint Pair | Angle (deg) | Kinematic Significance | |------------|-------------|------------------------| | Shoulder-Elbow-Wrist (R) | 142° | Near-extension, reaching upward-right | | Shoulder-Elbow-Wrist (L) | 88° (occluded) | Flexed, hidden behind back | | Hip-Knee-Ankle (R) | 165° | Almost straight, weight-bearing | | Hip-Knee-Ankle (L) | 112° | Flexed, possibly lifted | | Neck-Shoulder (R/L) | 25° / -12° | Asymmetrical shoulder elevation | pose 22

| Dataset | "Pose 22" Meaning | Kinematic Pattern | |---------|-------------------|-------------------| | COCO WholeBody | Index 22 in person keypoint array | Standing, arms down | | Human3.6M | Subject S9, Action 22 (Sitting) | Seated, torso upright | | AMASS (MoCap) | Frame 22 of a specific sequence | Mid-stride walking | Cross-Dataset Comparison: The Ambiguity of "Pose 22" Outside

[2] Newell, A., Yang, K., & Deng, J. (2016). Stacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimation. ECCV . Action 22 (Sitting) | Seated